Detailed Answer
(a) Extraordinary items, gains or losses from disposal of
a segment of a business, and unusual or infrequently occurring
items should not be prorated over the balance of the fiscal year.
Thus, the $20,000 ($60,000 / 3) extraordinary gain that was
allocated to the third quarter should be subtracted from net income
as it actually occurred in the second quarter. Consistent
with the view that all accounting changes should be made effective
as of the beginning of the fiscal period, the cumulative effect
of the accounting change on retained earnings is computed at the
beginning of the fiscal year and reported in the first interim period’s
income statement. If a cumulative-effect type change is
made during an interim period subsequent to the first one, the
prior interim reports must be restated as if the changes had been
effective as of the first day of the fiscal year. Thus, the $16,000
cumulative-effect loss should not be recognized in the third quarter.
The prior interim reports should be restated and the $16,000
loss should be added back to income of the third quarter to correct
the income to be reported for the quarter. Property taxes
should be allocated among the applicable quarters. As Kell Corp.
properly allocated their property taxes, no adjustment to income
is needed. Kell should report $91,000 ($95,000 - $20,000 +
$16,000) as net income for the quarter ended September 30, year
1.